12-12-2025
Good day directors of foundations and companies that facilitate Dutch dispute committees, and every chairperson of each committee. Mainly Ms. Jiske Prinsen-Den Ridder, director of the SKGe, and Ms. José Lentz-Peters, director of DOKh. Your foundations and committees keep committing crimes by not executing the law, as the legislator wants and intends. Especially when this targets the human body, this is serious and vital.

The Healthcare Quality, Complaints and Disputes Act (Wkkgz) solely aims at ensuring that patients receive justice (Explanation of the Act, paragraph 12.5, in Dutch). This law contains ¨complaint-handling¨ and ¨dispute-resolution¨ (Answers to parliamentary questions, Page 5, in Dutch). These are two separate interventions against injustice to every patient.

A dispute committee has only one task (see message on 02-12-2025) but against this it handles complaints itself, for which it has no authority to do so. It abuses the given authority (Articles 3:15 and 3:13 of the Dutch Civil Code). Every worker in the healthcare, a foundation, or committee knows this. Thus that the REQUIRED good faith is lacking (Articles 3:15 and 3:11 of the Dutch Civil Code) in each ¨complaint handling¨ by a committee. This not-condemning of not-solving complaints is the second help to family-doctors (for the first help see message on 02-12-2025). It encourages them to completely not-handling complaints but redirect these to the committee (which is not a care-dealer).

Then there is the Public Scrutiny, regardless of which civilian exercises this control and in this case by me. This is the unique authorized guardian of the ¨Fair trial¨ (Campbell and Fell versus U.K., June 28, 1984, §91). This Scrutiny has the final judgment on every public decision of a (arbitrational) judicial body. This Scrutiny-judgment was and will remain in force as long as the European Convention for the PROTECTION of Human Rights was and will remain in force; Each of you was and remains criminal.

From history is predictable that each of you will fight against this. Because you will not let a civilian/patient tell you what to do (see also the Natuurmonumenten affair). With certainty shall the refuting and contradiction be done by (A) pseudo-interpreting every law OR by (B) isolating me or every civilian ¨with specific demands or facts¨ away from the general (people).

Your contradiction is harassment and cannot possibly create a dispute. Because you too, are always referring to 1 law, of which 1 is the maker (signing on behalf of all participants) who has unique ownership over its thought. THUS the ownership of what is wanted to intend in its authentic expression in the law. This ownership exists as long as the law exists from the moment it came into effect. What a legislator of the law (the maker) wants and intends with it, can be found in its working documents. Therefore, any contradiction is a lie and harassment.

But ms. Prinsen, ms. Lentz and their sharers don´t let anyone, not even the legislature, tell them what to do. Good and peaceful together living must they destroy (see also the Natuurmonumenten affair). They follow their own pseudo-interpretations and new agreements, judgments, guidelines or laws have no use at all for oafs. So that crime (thus chaos) returns and gives any tiran inside the oafs, opportunity to dominate over the chaos.

A lawyer or a tribunal is not required to tell this. Exchange information and legislation to each other, with acknowledgement of source for verification, suites very well. So a two-way learning-talk for which a winner is NOT required. THIS learning conversation is complaint handling!! OR this unmasks the oaf/criminal due to its bullying.

This message is with the URLs, also published at the site of the legal public scrutiny:
Home > Notices of default to the Clique > Open messages released at Facebook